Category Archives: First Printed Greek Text

71. Is the Textus Receptus infallible? (Rev.17:8)

Posted on January 31, 2013 by Herman of bibledifferences.net

71 Is the Textus Receptus infallible? Revelation 17:8. Translators of the Bible have the responsibility to present to the reader a translation that is understandable and that makes sense. In one case this is the reason that we would read … Continue reading →

Posted in Ancient Translations, Desiderius Erasmus, First Printed Greek Text, KJV/NIV Controversy, Textus Receptus, United Bible Societies Text | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

66 Luke’s unique writing style, Acts 28:29

Posted on November 27, 2012 by Herman of bibledifferences.net

Luke’s unique writing style Acts 28:29 In older versions of the Bible that were translated from the Textus Receptus as source text for the New Testament, like the King James Version, we find a verse 29: KJV: “And when he had … Continue reading →

Posted in Ancient Translations, Church Fathers, Desiderius Erasmus, First Printed Greek Text, KJV/NIV Controversy, Textus Receptus, United Bible Societies Text | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

25. Antique Translations.

Posted on August 10, 2012 by Herman of bibledifferences.net

Antique translations. Many of the first Christians were not Greek, or did not have sufficient knowledge of Greek to be confident in using the Greek New Testament scriptures only. Consequently as early as the second and third centuries the documents … Continue reading →

Posted in Ancient Translations, Desiderius Erasmus, First Printed Greek Text, Textus Receptus, United Bible Societies Text, Vulgate | Leave a comment

22. The Printed Greek Text.

Posted on August 7, 2012 by Herman of bibledifferences.net

22. The Printed Greek Text. After the invention of printing by Johannes Gutenberg (1398 – 1468) around 1439, one of his first projects was the printing of a magnificent edition of the Latin Vulgate during 1450 to 1456. At least … Continue reading →

Posted in Desiderius Erasmus, First Printed Greek Text, KJV/NIV Controversy, Textus Receptus | Tagged | 4 Comments